Idaho prisoner Thomas Creech secures stay of execution, alleges cruel and unusual punishment

BOISE (Idaho Statesman) — Immediately following the Idaho prison system’s failure Wednesday to execute the state’s longest-serving death row prisoner by lethal injection, his attorneys secured a stay of execution from a federal judge and filed a new demand to protect their client’s constitutional rights.

U.S. District Court Judge Amanda Brailsford for the District of Idaho issued a stay of execution for prisoner Thomas Creech about a half-hour after Idaho Department of Correction officials called off his lethal injection when they couldn’t locate a vein for an IV. Attorneys for the prison system did not contest the emergency request for the stay from Creech’s attorneys, who alleged in their court filing that the execution team had “badly botched” their client’s scheduled lethal injection Wednesday morning.

Creech’s attorneys wrote that they were not aware at the time of their filing whether the prison system would again try to execute their client during his active death warrant, which expired at the end of the day Wednesday. IDOC Director Josh Tewalt said during a Wednesday afternoon press conference that the prison system decided not to make another attempt to execute Creech.

Tewalt and media witnesses said the execution team tried eight times to find a vein in different areas of Creech’s body over about an hour. The execution team’s failure to end Creech’s life by lethal injection “proves IDOC’s inability to carry out a humane and constitutional execution,” his attorneys wrote.

A new death warrant — what would be the 13th for Creech since he was convicted of murder for the November 1974 shooting deaths of two men in Valley County — would need to be issued if prison officials were to attempt to execute him again. Creech, 73, received the death penalty and has been incarcerated in Idaho for nearly 50 years, the bulk of that time on death row.

Next, Creech’s attorneys with the legal nonprofit Federal Defender Services of Idaho argued that their client’s constitutional rights may have been violated during Wednesday’s execution attempt. They issued a legal demand that the prison system preserve all evidence, and that the execution chamber be kept in its present condition. They sought to inspect and photograph the chamber, and immediately speak with their client.

“This motion is based on Mr. Creech’s right to an execution free from cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment,” wrote Creech’s attorneys in the case that names Tewalt, Idaho maximum security prison Warden Tim Richardson and IDOC prisons chief Chad Page as the defendants.

Members of the Idaho attorney general’s office objected on their behalf in a response filing, arguing that Creech’s attorneys had not stated a viable legal claim. They asked that Brailsford reject the request.

“While (the) plaintiff cites the Eighth Amendment, the motion does not contain any legal or other authoritative source citations to support plaintiff’s requests that IDOC preserve ‘evidence’ and the execution chamber,” the prison officials’ attorneys said.

Brailsford held a Wednesday afternoon conference call with attorneys from both sides to discuss the emergency demand, according to the court docket. The judge during the call reminded each side of their responsibility to preserve information they believe could be relevant in a future lawsuit.

Brailsford found the emergency demand to be moot, the docket stated, after attorneys for Creech and the prison system during the call reached agreement on each of the three requests in the legal demand.

The terms of that compromise were not immediately clear. Creech was returned to his cell after prison officials called off the execution, prison officials said. Tewalt said Wednesday that state officials are reviewing what they may do next.